Monday, September 23, 2019

Touchy Subjects: Native Ancestry

First off a disclaimer: None of the information in this post is presented with the intention of helping people to earn enrollment to any of the tribes currently recognized by the United States. Also, if you found this blog because you're looking for your Cherokee Princess™ ancestor you should probably read this first. And now that I've rained on your parade let's get on with the actual post.


We've all heard someone claim they've "got Indian in them". That statement, especially within the context of citing the source of certain physical characteristics, is a problematic line of thinking. It condenses Native Americans into one mythical group who all have razor sharp cheekbones and strong noses. In reality there were thousands of tribes when colonizers began arriving in North America in the 1600s but even as their numbers began to dwindle after contact they still didn't (and currently don't) all have the same features. This is really obvious looking through the photos of Native North Americans taken by Edward S. Curtis in the 1900s. I didn't mention any of that to imply that physical features can't be indicative of someones ancestry (although it can be an unreliable indicator). I just want to stress that with genealogy it's important to view any family story that isn't backed up by evidence with some skepticism. When attempting to prove (or disprove) the presence of Native ancestors in your family tree keep in mind that the story you've been told may be minus some unpleasant details that the person who lived it couldn't bear to repeat. Things like kidnapping, rape, and women being given as gifts aren't the sort of stories you want to tell the grand kids but those missing details become apparent once you research the history of contact between the Natives, Africans, and Europeans in North and South America. Few people know for example, that when Jamestown colony was founded the workforce was entirely indentured servants from England. When Africans were added to the workforce in Jamestown they conveniently replaced the indentured servants who were already complaining of mistreatment and running away to live with nearby Natives. And yes, Native people owned slaves. The reason many began buying slaves was to demonstrate how "civilized" they were to the invading Europeans. They thought were led to believe that adopting their practices would help them to retain their ancestral lands. Meanwhile the Spanish and Portuguese whose colonizing attempts began a century earlier were behaving in much the same as the British. Mexico, South America, Canada, and the Caribbean all had their own thriving Native populations and all of them came into contact with both free and enslaved African people at some point. But none of those stories are taught in American schools in their entirety; if at all, and I wonder how many people are out there looking for evidence of Native ancestry and not realizing they aren't even looking in the right place or for the right people.


Conquistador and tyrant Juan Onate's graffiti over a Native carving in New Mexico

For anyone wanting to prove a story of Native ancestry without first taking a DNA test...things are going to be difficult for you. Researching the history of an area your ancestor was born or lived in before and after European contact will help you to understand the circumstances under which your African (and likely European) ancestors may have come into contact with Native groups and give you a good idea of what records exist and clues for what to look for in them. The Powhatan tribes of Virginia, the Choctaw of Alabama, and the Cherokee of Georgia all have well documented instances of intermarriage and mixing between the Natives, Africans, and Europeans and can be traced to specific family names. Sometimes people note those things in their family trees (but not always in the most racially sensitive way unfortunately) and sometimes they don't. This is a touchy subject for some people who would rather gloss over the not so nice historical context of how they came to be related to Native or mixed race people or because they've bought into the "one drop rule". Your best bet is to do your own research rather than take someone else's tree as fact (unless they are a certified genealogist with plenty of cited sources and even then you may be aware of information/clues in the form of oral history that they aren't). Even if you know exactly where to look and who to look for you will not be able to pick out who is Native or mixed race from names alone. (Please read the Cherokee princess link at the top of the page if you skipped it for reasons why.) The census specifically can be confusing when it comes to a person race or more accurately their perceived race since the race column was up to the discretion of the enumerator or the neighbor giving the information to them for someone who wasn't home at the time. I have seen within my own family research people go from being white on one census, to mulatto on the next, or from being mulatto on one to black on another. Keeping all of that in mind, a good place to start after you've researched an area and it's original population is the Dawes Rolls for that state.

For those who have taken a DNA test your first step is going to be transferring that data to DNA.land (or Gedmatch.com) where you'll be able to get more detailed information about your ethnic ancestry than what you may have gotten from a DNA testing service due to a more well rounded data set. (In my opinion Ancestry.com in particular tries to distract from a overly European data set by catering to what they think users of African descent want to see. Rather than giving information on individual African or Native groups a user matches with or admitting that their data set is lacking in samples from those groups they instead highlight what they call migrations within the United States and downplay unidentifiable ancestry as "noise" to be dismissed when in reality it's simply what's missing from their data set.) Kits from all of the major testing companies will work on DNA.land and are easy to upload. Results are presented in a simple color coded chart format with a map. DNA.land recently sent out emails to it's users and posted an article to Medium.com stating that the site's original use as a research project operated by Colombia University and the New York Genome Project has ended and it will be relaunched unaffiliated with either group. Additionally all currently uploaded kits on the site will be deleted and will need to be reuploaded after the relaunch. So you might want to hold off on uploading to the site until after the September 30th relaunch to save time but keep in mind that it's unclear whether or not the new version will still be free... 
Continue reading after the jump


You can also get ethnicity breakdowns with Gedmatch but DNA.land is much more user friendly in my opinion. I use both but prefer DNA.land for viewing ethnicity percentages and mostly use Gedmatch for comparing my DNA kits against other people who have tested with different companies. To be fair though Gedmatch's ethnicity breakdowns are more specific once you learn how to use all of the tools on their site but a lot of people are not patient enough to. There is a how to guide on the website but Kitty Cooper's slide show presentation on how to use Gedmatch's admixture tools here is simple and easy to follow.


As for my own DNA.land results...


Click image to enlarge

Click image to enlarge

As you can see my own Native ancestry is estimated at a paltry 1.5% (If I don't count that ambiguous 1.6% that is) but within that tiny number is a surprisingly long list of Native North and South American groups. A lot of which probably traces back to my maternal 5th great grandmother Julia who was enslaved on a plantation in St. Augustine in the 1780s when it was known as Spanish East Florida. Julia's daughter Maria Rosa, whose father was British, lived her life as a free person and had a son with a Spanish settler from the Sanchez family. The Sanchez', originally from Spain, were among the first settlers of St. Augustine. When Britain briefly gained control of Florida as part of the Treaty of Paris most of the Sanchez family and their slaves (along with Spanish colonists who were from other European countries) left for Cuba or Mexico but returned 10 years later when Spain was once again in control of the area. Naturally over that 10 year period there was some mixing between groups in those places which resulted in introducing some South American ancestry into the population of Florida. And as expected when I began to research each group in my results what they all had in common was contact with the Spanish.

Once you have your ethnicity results research each Native American group so that you have at least a basic understanding of where they lived and their history. See the resource links at the bottom of this post if you're unsure of where to start. Wikipedia can also be a good starting point but shouldn't be relied on since it's edited constantly and is often missing citations. In my experience Wikipedia in Spanish tends to have much more information than the English version when it comes to topics related to the Spanish colonies and it's major players which makes sense as most of the surviving records are in Spanish and owned by Spain. To use this to your advantage go to the Wikipedia main page and click "Espanol" instead of English. The site format will be exactly the same as the English version with the search bar at the upper right and "Buscar en Wikipedia" inside it. Use it as you normally would and then click translate on your web browser. In Chrome you will find the translate option inside the search bar. Learn how to configure Chrome to do this automatically here. Use this online Spanish dictionary to translate search terms that might not work in English. 


The images below are a comparison of the Wikipedia articles for St. Augustine, Florida in Spanish (translated) and English. Notice while both articles cover the city's history the Spanish version goes into detail about it's role as a sanctuary for runaway slaves while the English version stresses the city's role as a haven for British Loyalists instead. (Slavery in Spanish Florida will be covered in a future post.)
Spanish to English translation of article
click image enlarge

English version of article
Click image to enlarge

Once you've got some historical context follow the same steps as you would for researching enslaved ancestors but broaden your search to include documents and resources relevant to the Native American groups you've matched with. 
***
Native American records at Ancestry.com (Some records are free)


Related Links

The Conquest of New Spain by Bernal Diaz del Castillo (First hand account of  what really happened when the Spanish landed in Mexico looking for gold.) 
I'm not affiliated with or sponsored by any of the genealogy services or sites mentioned.



No comments:

Post a Comment

Spam and comments that do not respectfully contribute to the discussion will be deleted.

Touchy Subjects: Native Ancestry

First off a disclaimer: None of the information in this post is presented with the intention of helping people to earn enrollment to any o...